California: Killing the Goose the Lays the Golden Eggs

December 1, 2009
By

Like the GI Bill that gave access to a college degree for the first time to a generation of Americans, the creation of the California State University system fifty years ago did the same for Californians. In the decades that followed there was an explosion of innovation in all fields and an era of unprecedented economic growth. These mid-20th Century public investments tapped into the talent of millions of people who would otherwise be denied access to a quality education. The highly skilled labor force these investments created helped make California the most vibrant state economy in the nation.

In a “white paper” titled, “‘Restructuring’ the CSU or Wrecking It?: What Proposed Changes Mean and What We Can Do about Them,” the California Faculty Association (CFA), the largest faculty union in the state (to which I belong), has identified the perilous path our “leaders” both in Sacramento and among CSU administrators are leading us down. “On every one of our campuses, we are seeing signs that a profound change in the mission of our California State University is being implemented from the top under cover of the economic crisis,” said CFA President Lillian Taiz, a professor of History at CSU Los Angeles. The state that brought the world microprocessors, cell phones, computers, and the Internet is in the process of gutting its system of public higher education in the name of “restructuring.” In effect, they’re killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

Governor Arnold Scwharzenegger and the Republicans in the Legislature who control California’s finances have apparently concluded that it is not even worth trying to compete with India and China anymore. California’s “leaders,” by abandoning the CSU, are throwing in the towel. They’ve given up. One would think that even Republicans like Senate Minority Leader Dennis Hollingsworth and Senator Dave Cogdill would care about maintaining America’s competitive edge against its commercial rivals. Yet they are pursuing an irresponsible and cynical “restructuring” of the CSU that is terrible for California’s future and bad for the United States’ position in the world economy.

State officials and CSU administrators have sent faculty contradictory signals. On the one hand, they tell us that we should willingly accept increased workloads, over-crowded classrooms, “furloughs,” downsizing and lay-offs; while, on the other hand, they tell us we should retain all the idealism and dedication that led us to become professional educators in the first place. Wave after wave of devastating budget cuts to the CSU have undermined academic excellence and have had a demoralizing effect on the people who have sought careers in higher education in California. “Faced with a seemingly endless onslaught of bad news about changes on our campuses that just ‘can’t be helped,’” the CFA paper sadly notes, educators are experiencing a growing “sense of futility and paralysis.”

“The current economic crisis provides cover for the destruction of public higher education in California,” the CFA “white paper” bluntly states. And it calls for organized resistance against any permanent “restructuring” of the CSU in the current context of widespread economic insecurity. The CFA document also points out: “The provision of a broad liberal education for communities that might have no other access is at the heart of the CSU’s mission and at the heart of what is under attack.” CSUs located in rural communities and those serving underrepresented students are currently being targeted to take the hardest hits.

“. . . The “restructuring” process is already under way on a number of CSU campuses including Bakersfield, Dominguez Hills, Humboldt, Pomona, San Diego and Stanislaus. The process is different from campus to campus and has begun under a number of different labels including “program planning,” “restructuring” and “prioritization.” Whatever the process is being called . . . there is a profound shift in public policy taking place concerning the CSU’s mission.”
CSU Chancellor Charles Reed and the Board of Trustees show zero leadership amidst the severest fiscal crisis the CSU has ever faced. They, along with visionless state politicians, are presiding over the systematic dismantling of public higher education in California. In the midst of the current economic crisis brought about by the failure of unregulated financial markets and twisted profit maximization schemes, California’s “leaders” have concluded that investing in higher education is no longer affordable. “There’s no money!” Chancellor Reed proclaims.

Yet the CFA’s position paper connects the “trillions of tax-payer dollars” that have been “spent in just the past year on bailing out banks,” with the bogus claim that there is no money available for higher education. It also notes that the draconian cuts to higher education in California contradict President Barack Obama’s stated commitment to a more enlightened educational policy.

Not only are we able to find the money to bail out banks and fight foreign wars but there are potential revenues right here in California that could be tapped to save public higher education. Perhaps Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Jay Leno and other wealthy people who choose to live in the Golden State could be asked to chip in a little more? Or maybe the Taco Bells and the KFCs and the Burger Kings and the McDonalds and the Home Depots and the Wal-Marts and all the other giant corporations that make a killing each year off California consumers could be asked to pay a little extra? Or perhaps we could pass Assembly Bill 656 to create a severance tax on oil extraction just as George W. Bush’s Texas and Sarah Palin’s Alaska do? Or maybe we could modify Proposition 13 to remove huge commercial real estate holdings from the tax exemption while retaining it for residential homeowners?

And where do Chancellor Reed and the Board of Trustees stand on these and other revenue-raising proposals that might save the college system they are charged to protect? They refuse to take a stand. And because they won’t take a stand it’s perfectly reasonable for Californians to demand an explanation.

The public must be made to appreciate what’s at stake here: A precious public resource that took decades to build is in the process of being “restructured” out of existence. Once it’s gone it will be very difficult (if not impossible) to build up again. And it will undermine the quality of life in California for decades to come. The Governor, the Legislature, and the CSU administrators have formed a wrecking crew. They seem willing to allow California’s workforce to become low wage and less educated, even though a low-wage society can never be an affluent society. The recent protests by University of California students and faculty show that those who support public higher education in California won’t go down without a fight. The CSU will only survive if students and their families heed the alarm bells CFA is ringing and stand up together and say: “Enough!”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

22 Responses to California: Killing the Goose the Lays the Golden Eggs

  1. Carleen Vais on November 16, 2011 at 3:23 pm

    Individuals are yours alright! . We a minimum of have to get these men and women stealing photographs to begin running a blog! They most likely just did a picture research and grabbed them. They appear excellent although!

  2. Mervin Brocker on November 18, 2011 at 10:35 am

    Hi! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website ahead of but right after searching by way of a few of the publish I recognized it is new to me. Anyways, I’m surely pleased I discovered it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back again often!

  3. Douglass Janning on November 18, 2011 at 3:37 pm

    Hello there! This article couldn’t be composed any much better! Studying by way of this publish reminds me of my prior space mate! He usually held speaking about this. I’ll ahead this informative article to him. Rather certain he’ll have a very great study. Thanks for sharing!

  4. Lesley Rushen on November 18, 2011 at 8:56 pm

    he website was how do i say it… relevant, finally something that helped me. Many thanks

  5. Long Rudolph on November 19, 2011 at 2:16 am

    Everything is quite open and really clear explanation of troubles. was truly details. Your site is really useful. Many thanks for sharing.

  6. Dorotha Erfert on November 19, 2011 at 5:41 pm

    I needed to thanks for this excellent examine!! I surely taking pleasure in every single minor little bit of it I’ve you bookmarked to examine out new things you post…

  7. Britni Lueck on November 19, 2011 at 10:49 pm

    I acquired very good information from the weblog

  8. Bart Arrowood on November 20, 2011 at 3:51 am

    Your design is so exclusive in comparison with numerous others. Thanks for publishing whenever you possess the option,Guess I’ll just make this bookmarked.two

  9. Marcelino Caplan on November 20, 2011 at 8:50 am

    Saved being a preferred, I truly like your weblog!

  10. Angel Senko on November 20, 2011 at 2:01 pm

    I obtained excellent information from a weblog

  11. Joesph Guardiola on November 20, 2011 at 7:22 pm

    Hello, just required you to know I he added your website to my Google bookmarks due to your layout. But seriously, I imagine your web internet site has 1 in the freshest theme I??ve came across. It extremely helps make looking at your web site significantly easier.

  12. Romeo Helaire on November 21, 2011 at 12:09 pm

    Hello there, I believe your website could be possessing browser compatibility problems. When I search at your web site in Safari, it seems very good but when opening in World wide web Explorer, it’s some overlapping. I just needed to provide you with a swift heads up! Other then that, great website!

  13. Gaston Blank on November 21, 2011 at 5:36 pm

    This can be a excellent ideas specifically to these new to blogosphere, quick and correct information… Many thanks for sharing this one particular. A need to study report.

  14. Terisa Parisio on November 21, 2011 at 11:01 pm

    I received excellent data out of your web site

  15. Bill Muegge on November 22, 2011 at 4:19 am

    Saved as being a favourite, I genuinely like your web site!

  16. Minh Naselli on November 25, 2011 at 11:30 am

    Wonderful publish. I’m dealing with a few these issues.

  17. New HCG diet on November 27, 2011 at 3:27 pm

    This is so great. I always find such interesting stuff when I stumble onto this site again and again!
    I’m going to be sharing this. Facebook here we come!

  18. american idol full episode on December 2, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    Thank you for another informative site. Where else may just I get that type of information written in such a perfect approach? I’ve a project that I’m just now running on, and I have been on the glance out for such information.

  19. play family feud for free on December 4, 2011 at 4:37 am

    You actually make it seem really easy with your presentation however I in finding this matter to be really something that I believe I would by no means understand. It seems too complex and very vast for me. I am taking a look ahead for your subsequent post, I will try to get the grasp of it!

  20. american idol episode on December 5, 2011 at 4:10 am

    Thanks for every other informative blog. Where else may just I get that type of info written in such an ideal manner? I have a venture that I am just now operating on, and I’ve been on the glance out for such info.

  21. the pileo diet food list on December 7, 2011 at 2:59 am

    Thank you for another great post. The place else could anyone get that kind of info in such an ideal way of writing? I’ve a presentation next week, and I’m on the look for such information.

  22. amateure on December 8, 2011 at 11:25 pm

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the , but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.